Following British Monarch = Following Allah Almighty? Did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Make the British Crown "Ulil Amr"?
Did Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Make the British Crown "Ulil Amr"?
Episode 118 recap | Seerat ul Mahdi | Zaitoon FM Live
Imagine being told, in your own scripture-based faith, that your loyalty to a foreign colonial government is not just good citizenship, but a Quranic command.
Not "obey the law." Not "live peacefully." But: the English crown belongs inside the Quran's own category of "those in authority", and you are to be obedient to it with sincerity of heart.
That is not an accusation invented by critics. It is printed in Ruhani Khazain, the collected writings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, in his own words, over his own signature. In this post we go through the pages one by one, using only Ahmadiyya sources, and let the author speak for himself.
At the end, there is a question that every Ahmadi, especially those who were born into the community and never had reason to ask it, should sit with honestly.
First, the Quranic verse at the centre of this
The verse is Surah an-Nisa (4:59). The Ahmadi edition of Ruhani Khazain footnotes it as "an-Nisa: 60", because it counts the Bismillah as a verse.
اَطِيْعُوا اللّٰهَ وَاَطِيْعُوا الرَّسُوْلَ وَاُولِى الْاَمْرِ مِنْكُمْ "Obey Allah, obey the Messenger, and those in authority among you."
The phrase "Ulil Amr minkum" (those in authority from among you) is the one that matters. Obedience to it is placed right next to obedience to Allah and the Messenger. Whoever is declared to be Ulil Amr is therefore being given a place in the religious order, not just the political one.
Now watch what Mirza Ghulam Ahmad does with it.
Exhibit 1: Zarurat-ul-Imam, Ruhani Khazain Vol. 13, pp. 493-494
On p. 493 he builds an argument: just as there must be one Imam spiritually, God wants one ameer and king in every nation. Then comes the verse, and his interpretation of it:
اُولِی الاَمر سے مراد جسمانی طور پر بادشاہ اور روحانی طور پر امام الزمان ہے۔ اور جسمانی طور پر جو شخص ہمارے مقاصد کا مخالف نہ ہو اور اس سے مذہبی فائدہ ہمیں حاصل ہو سکے وہ ہم میں سے ہے۔ اسی لئے میری نصیحت اپنی جماعت کو یہی ہے کہ وہ انگریزوں کی بادشاہت کو اپنے اُولی الامر میں داخل کریں اور دل کی سچائی سے ان کے مطیع رہیں
Translation: "By Ulil Amr is meant, physically, the king, and spiritually, the Imam of the Age. And physically, whoever is not opposed to our aims and from whom we can gain religious benefit is one of us. That is why my advice to my community is this: include the sovereignty of the English within your Ulil Amr, and remain obedient to them with sincerity of heart." (Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 13, Zarurat-ul-Imam, p. 493)
Read that again slowly. Three things are happening in these few lines:
- A definition. The "physical" Ulil Amr is the king.
- A test for who qualifies. Not justice, not Islam, not even being a Muslim. The test is: "Is he not opposed to our aims, and can we get religious benefit from him?" If yes, "he is from among us" (the same wording as "minkum").
- A direct instruction to the Jama'at: enter the English crown into your Ulil Amr and obey with sincerity of heart.
That is a religious ruling on how to read the Quran, not a political aside.
The next page raises the stakes
On p. 494 he explains why, and then tells us what the alternative looks like:
...ہم خیانت کریں گے اگر اس بات کا اقرار نہ کریں کہ انگریزوں نے ہمارے دین کو ایک قسم کی وہ مدد دی ہے کہ جو ہندوستان کے اسلامی بادشاہوں کو بھی میسر نہیں آ سکی... پس انگریزوں کے خلاف بغاوت کی کھچڑی پکاتے رہنا خدا تعالیٰ کی نعمتوں کو فراموش کرنا ہے۔
Translation: "...we would be committing treachery if we did not acknowledge that the English have given our religion a kind of help which even the Muslim kings of India could not provide... So to keep cooking up the stew of rebellion against the English is to forget the blessings of God." (Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 13, p. 494)
Notice the vocabulary:
- Not acknowledging British help = "khiyanat" (treachery).
- Opposing the British = ingratitude to God's blessings.
- British help to "our religion" is said to exceed even that of Muslim kings.
Then he returns to the main thread and says the Quran commands physical civilisation to move under one king, and the same command points to spiritual civilisation, which he links to the du'a "Guide us to the straight path", and closes the paragraph with: "So the allusion in this verse is that you be with the Imam of the Age."
So the structure is complete: One king physically, one Imam spiritually, and the British crown is the king.
Exhibit 2: Kashf-ul-Ghita, Ruhani Khazain Vol. 14, p. 213 (27 December 1898)
If you think Zarurat-ul-Imam was a one-off, here is Mirza Ghulam Ahmad summing up his entire mission in a book addressed to the government. The date printed under his signature is 27 December 1898.
اے معزز ناظرین! اب میں نے جو کچھ میرے اصول اور ہدایتیں اور تعلیم تھی سب گورنمنٹ عالیہ کی خدمت میں ظاہر کر دیں۔ میری ہدایتوں کا خلاصہ یہی ہے کہ صلح کاری اور غریبی سے زندگی بسر کرو اور جس گورنمنٹ کے ہم ماتحت ہیں یعنی گورنمنٹ برطانیہ اس کے سچے خیر خواہ اور تابعدار ہو جاؤ نہ نفاق اور دنیاداری سے۔
Translation: "O respected readers! I have now laid before the exalted Government everything that was my principles, my instructions, and my teaching. The summary of my instructions is this: live in peace and humility, and become the true well-wishers and obedient subjects of the government under which we live, that is, the British Government, not out of hypocrisy and worldliness."
"The summary of my instructions." Out of everything: tawheed, prophethood, the Hereafter, worship, character, the very first thing he offers as the khulasa (essence) of his guidance is loyalty to the British government.
And he doesn't stop there. The book ends with a prayer:
...خدا تعالیٰ ہماری ملکہ معظمہ قیصرہ ہند دام اقبالہا کا اقبال دن بدن بڑھاوے اور ہمیں توفیق دے کہ ہم سچے دل سے اس کے تابعدار اور امن پسند انسان ہوں۔ آمین
Translation: "...may God increase the fortune of our Exalted Queen, Empress of India, day by day, and grant us the ability to be, with a sincere heart, her obedient and peace-loving subjects. Amen."
And just above that, on the same page, he ties his doctrine about Hazrat Isa (as) directly to this political message: the conclusion he draws is that Isa (as) never ascended to heaven and will never return to fight alongside a Mahdi, but "fell asleep in Kashmir in the lap of his God's mercy." According to him this is what makes the "blessed building of peace and conciliation" shine.
Pause on that. A theological claim (the death of Isa) is being sold as the foundation of political peace with the government.
Exhibit 3: Tiryaq-ul-Qulub, Ruhani Khazain Vol. 15, pp. 492-493
Here Mirza Ghulam Ahmad appears before the government in the role of a petitioner. And what he reports about his opponents is revealing.
He writes that the Muslim clerics of the country trouble him excessively, have issued fatwas for his killing, and have declared him a kafir. Then he reports a specific charge they were publishing against him:
...اس قسم کے اشتہار میرے مقابل پر شائع کرتے ہیں کہ یہ شخص اس وجہ سے بھی کافر ہے کہ اس نے انگریزی سلطنت کو سلطنت روم پر ترجیح دی ہے اور ہمیشہ انگریزی سلطنت کی تعریف کرتا ہے۔
Translation: "...they publish notices against me of this kind: that this man is a kafir for this reason too, that he has preferred the English government over the Sultanate of Rome (the Ottoman Sultanate), and always praises the English government." (Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 15, Tiryaq-ul-Qulub, p. 492)
Please note what this page does and does not say. It records, in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own book, that his contemporaries accused him of preferring the British crown over the Ottoman Sultan and of constant praise for British rule. On this page he reports the allegation as part of his complaint about the clerics; the reader can check the surrounding pages in the full book to see how he answers it.
Then he states what he wants from his own followers and from Muslims in general:
...اور یہ اپنی اس گورنمنٹ کی ایسی اطاعت کریں کہ دوسروں کے لئے نمونہ بن جائیں۔
Translation: "...and that they obey this government of theirs in such a manner that they become a model for others."
And on the next page (p. 493), he goes further:
He says that if Muslims were to adopt his teachings, he could swear that they would become "angels", and that if they became the best well-wishers of this government among all its peoples, they would be the most fortunate of all nations.
Here again the pattern repeats. "Reform" and "loyalty to the government" are presented as one package.
Exhibit 4: Government Angrezi aur Jihad, Ruhani Khazain Vol. 17, pp. 28-29
This is the one that takes it from advice to condition of membership.
...اور ہر ایک شخص جو میری بیعت کرتا ہے اور مجھ کو مسیح موعود مانتا ہے اسی روز سے اُس کو یہ عقیدہ رکھنا پڑتا ہے کہ اس زمانہ میں جہاد قطعاً حرام ہے کیونکہ مسیح آ چکا۔ خاص کر میری تعلیم کے لحاظ سے اس گورنمنٹ انگریزی کا سچا خیرخواہ اس کو بننا پڑتا ہے نہ محض نفاق سے...
Translation: "...and every person who takes my bay'at and accepts me as the Promised Messiah, from that very day he has to hold the belief that jihad in this age is absolutely haram, because the Messiah has come. Especially according to my teaching, he has to become a true well-wisher of this English government, not merely out of hypocrisy..." (Ruhani Khazain, Vol. 17, Government Angrezi aur Jihad, p. 28)
Look at the verbs: "has to hold", "has to become." This is not "we recommend." This is described as what the bay'at itself requires, from the very day a person enters the Jama'at.
On the same page he explains his purpose as the Messiah: to stop Muslims from "savage attacks and bloodshed", and he claims his Jama'at, which he puts at about thirty thousand in British India, is already living proof. On the next page (p. 29) he declares that he has raised "the flag of conciliation", and that not even a hundred thousand maulvis could have set up a movement with such an effect on stopping jihad.
Putting the four exhibits together
| Book (Ruhani Khazain) | What it says about the British crown |
|---|---|
| Zarurat-ul-Imam, Vol. 13, pp. 493-494 | Include the English crown in your Ulil Amr; obey with sincerity of heart; failing to acknowledge their help is "treachery"; rebellion is ingratitude to God |
| Kashf-ul-Ghita, Vol. 14, p. 213 | "Summary of my instructions": be true well-wishers and obedient subjects of the British Government; closing prayer for the Queen-Empress |
| Tiryaq-ul-Qulub, Vol. 15, pp. 492-493 | Opponents' charge: he preferred England over the Ottoman Sultan; his wish: make Muslims obey this government as a model |
| Government Angrezi aur Jihad, Vol. 17, pp. 28-29 | Every person taking bay'at must believe jihad is haram and become a true well-wisher of the British Government |
Now lay the chain out in plain steps:
- The Quran commands obedience to Ulil Amr, in the same breath as Allah and the Messenger.
- Mirza Ghulam Ahmad defines the worldly Ulil Amr as the king.
- He tells his community to place the English crown inside that category.
- He makes loyalty and the rejection of jihad a belief that comes with bay'at.
- He frames opposition to British rule as ingratitude to God and failure to acknowledge British help as treachery.
Taken together, this is why the claim of this episode is not an exaggeration: in these texts, loyalty to the British crown is presented as a religious obligation derived from the Quran, not just a political preference.
"But he was only being grateful for religious freedom"
This is the standard Ahmadi response, and it deserves to be stated fairly.
On p. 494 of Zarurat-ul-Imam itself, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad says that under the Sikhs, congregational prayer and even the azan had become difficult in Punjab, and that the English restored religious freedom. That is the reasoning he gives for gratitude. A defender will say: this is thanks for protection, not a theology of kingship.
There are three points worth considering before accepting that explanation:
- The argument he makes is not "thank the government". It is "the Quran says Ulil Amr, and I tell you the British are your Ulil Amr." Gratitude doesn't need a Quranic exegesis. A command does.
- The same texts state a condition. In Vol. 13 he says the one who is "not opposed to our aims" and from whom "we can gain religious benefit" is "from among us." A principle that depends on benefit to the Jama'at is a strategic principle, and it was applied to a specific ruler.
- Bay'at is not a thank-you note. Vol. 17 makes the belief a requirement from the first day. Gratitude can't be a membership condition.
You are free to disagree with these readings. But you can only do so honestly after reading the pages yourself, and you should read the full surrounding chapters of each book, not only the pages shown here, to satisfy yourself of the context.
Food for thought: questions for every Ahmadi
You don't need to answer these to anyone but yourself.
1. Who is "Ulil Amr" today? If the English crown was formally placed inside "Ulil Amr" in Ahmadi belief, what has happened to that ruling since the Raj ended? Who holds that status now, and by what authority was the ruling changed?
2. Is that the Quran's meaning, or his? The verse says "minkum", from among you. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own wording, "jo hum mein se ho", ties it to benefit to the Jama'at. Is that really what the verse is saying, or is it a reading that fits one historical moment?
3. Why is this "the summary" of the teachings? In Kashf-ul-Ghita, the khulasa of his guidance is not worship, not tawheed, but loyalty to a colonial government. Is that what you were taught was the essence of the message?
4. What do we make of the timing? The teaching "jihad is haram" arrives together with a claim to be the Promised Messiah, in the era of the very government that benefits from it. Did you ever ask yourself whether the order of events is a coincidence?
5. When did you last read it yourself? Most of us inherit our beliefs along with our names. Have you ever opened Ruhani Khazain Vol. 13, 14, 15 and 17 and read these pages with your own eyes, in your own language, without a summary from anyone?
One last message
This post does not ask you to hate anyone, and it does not ask you to take our word for anything. It asks you for something harder: to check.
Every page quoted here is from an Ahmadi book. Take the volume and page numbers below, open your own copy, and read the lines before and after. If I have misread anything, the page will show it. If I haven't, then ask yourself calmly:
If a belief is true, it has nothing to fear from being examined. And if you have been following something since childhood without ever once examining it, isn't it time you did?
Truth does not need inheritance. It survives questions.
Full reference list (verify these yourself)
| # | Book | Ruhani Khazain | Page(s) | What to look for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zarurat-ul-Imam | Vol. 13 | 493 | "Ulil Amr = physically the king, spiritually the Imam of the Age"; "include the English sovereignty in your Ulil Amr" |
| 2 | Zarurat-ul-Imam | Vol. 13 | 494 | "We would be committing treachery..."; British help greater than that of Muslim kings; rebellion = forgetting God's blessings |
| 3 | Kashf-ul-Ghita | Vol. 14 | 213 | "Summary of my instructions"; signature dated 27 Dec 1898; prayer for the Queen-Empress |
| 4 | Tiryaq-ul-Qulub | Vol. 15 | 492 | Opponents' charge of preferring England over the Sultanate of Rome; wish for followers to obey the government as a model |
| 5 | Tiryaq-ul-Qulub | Vol. 15 | 493 | "Angels" claim; well-wishers of the government |
| 6 | Government Angrezi aur Jihad | Vol. 17 | 28 | Bay'at requires belief that jihad is haram and becoming a true well-wisher of the British Government |
| 7 | Government Angrezi aur Jihad | Vol. 17 | 29 | "Flag of conciliation"; his role as Mahdi |
Note on sources and translations: All quotations above are taken from the scanned pages of Ruhani Khazain reproduced in this post. The English translations are our own and are meant to convey the sense of the Urdu. Page numbers refer to the Ruhani Khazain edition from which the scans were taken; always compare with your own copy. As Jamat is continuously changing books, page numbers may vary slightly.
Source pages
Ruhani Khazain Vol. 13, Zarurat-ul-Imam, p. 493
Ruhani Khazain Vol. 13, Zarurat-ul-Imam, p. 494
Ruhani Khazain Vol. 14, Kashf-ul-Ghita, p. 213
Ruhani Khazain Vol. 17, Government Angrezi aur Jihad, p. 28
Seerat ul Mahdi is a critical, source-based series on Zaitoon FM Live. Join our WhatsApp channel for each new episode: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaZjLojCsU9PCulqXv1H
.heic)
Comments
Post a Comment