Zaitoon FM

OLD Messiah Gone, New in Town? A man from Rabwah is reportedly claiming that he is the true Promised Messiah—and that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was mistaken.   The claim is striking enough on its own. But what makes it particularly significant is the theological question it raises for the Ahmadiyya community: if God continues to communicate with His chosen servants, how does the community determine whether a new claimant is genuine or false? The man, identified as Inam-ul-Hai , presents himself as the true Promised Messiah. In a video of approximately 30 minutes, he explains his claims and challenges the religious position established by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian. We are publishing his claims here for documentation and discussion. The accompanying photograph is also noteworthy because the claimant has written his own claim on the photograph. The photograph above is presented as documentary material. The written statement on it is attributed to the claimant himself. The Claim: “I Am t...

At this year's Jalsa Salana , an elderly Ahmadi stood up in front of the crowd and said it plainly: Khalifa Masroor is not Rab — but he is " Rab-numa ." God-manifest. God-like. No hadith was cited. No Quranic verse was offered. Just a declaration, delivered with total confidence, to an audience that received it without objection. Watch him say it yourself: That absence of pushback is the actual story here. In Ahmadiyya Jamat 's own framing, the community represents the "real Islam" — the corrective to what it calls the grave-worship and shirk of mainstream Muslims.  Yet the Quran states, in verse 42:11 (Ash-Shura), " Laysa kamislihi shay'un " — there is nothing whatsoever like Him.  فَاطِرُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٰتِ وَٱلْأَرْضِ ۚ جَعَلَ لَكُم مِّنْ أَنفُسِكُمْ أَزْوَٰجًا وَمِنَ ٱلْأَنْعَـٰمِ أَزْوَٰجًا ۖ يَذْرَؤُكُمْ فِيهِ ۚ لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِۦ شَىْءٌ ۖ وَهُوَ ٱلسَّمِيعُ ٱلْبَصِيرُ ١١ ˹He is˺ the Originator of the heavens and the earth. He has made for ...

Is Ahmadiyya Islam or Not? A Fact-Based Look at the Debate If you've typed this question into Google, you've probably landed on two extremes: Ahmadiyya community websites insisting there's no difference at all, and anti-Ahmadi sites calling them outright non-Muslims or worse. Neither extreme actually explains why this argument exists. This post lays out the actual theological disagreement, where it comes from, how it plays out legally in different countries, and what each side genuinely believes — without flattening either position into a caricature. Who Are Ahmadis, Briefly The Ahmadiyya Community was founded in 1889 in Qadian, Punjab (British India), by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad . He claimed to be a mujaddid (divinely appointed reformer), and later declared himself the promised Messiah and Mahdi awaited in Islamic end-times belief. He also claimed to be "Muhammad" in " Burooz " (will talk about it later) After his death, the community split into two b...

Ahmadis Removed Muhammad from Kalima? A Shocking Revelation The Kalima Tayyiba, a declaration of faith central to Islam, states: "La ilaha illallah, Muhammadur Rasul Allah." It confirms the oneness of Allah and the Prophethood of Muhammad (peace be upon him). However, the Ahmadiyya community has once again exposed its true colors by altering the Kalima in their video titled " Ahmadiyya 101 ", Published on MTA Official YouTube Channel. The Incident In the video, Ahmadis outlined their 5 core beliefs, starting with the 5 pillars of Islam. When discussing the first pillar—the Kalima—they displayed a slide with the words "La ilaha illallah" but omitted "Muhammad Rasul Allah." This deliberate removal starkly reflects their belief in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a prophet, contradicting the Quranic declaration of Muhammad (peace be upon him) as the final prophet. True Colors of Ahmadiyya By excluding "Muhammad Rasul Allah," t...